the implicate Order Variable in the Scientific Equation
Just like Physicist William Tiller's Psychoenergetic Science experiments, Bohm's implicate order has received little if any attention by mainstream scientists. The ironic part about this behavior is that it is anything but scientific in spirit and action alike. It is also unfortunate, because if those same scientists chose to employ the implicate order variable in the scientific equation, they could experimentally solve some of science's largest "mysteries" to date.
Don't Hassle Me, I'm Local
Using the implicate order as a framework, science can begin to reconcile various unexplained and somewhat controversial sticking points in the search to understand the workings of the Universe and humankind in both a reality-based, and more importantly, consciousness-based sense. The first is Local Versus Non-Local Interaction. As far as many physicists are concerned, localized interaction is the only existent method of physical influence. Localization means that in order for an effect to occur, the cause of that effect must be related to it in a proximal distance sense.
And of course in a Universe made up of only four dimensions, decoherent localization would indeed be the only scientifically plausible explanation for action and interaction between a large group of particles, like people and planets alike.
The test subjects were also able to elicit a response from the device quicker than if they had walked to the room it was in to touch it. This is because non-localization does not require the same time-based causational factors necessary to prove an interaction took place. Or in other words, it negates the need for a teleological action that then requires seconds, minutes, hours or days for an opposite reaction to occur.
And of course, when taking into account the seven super-dimensionary layers comprising the non-physical portion of our 11th dimensional human bio-body suits, there really is no such thing as dead space for localization to need to occur in anyway. Rather, there is only the larger implicate order bonding and binding everything and everyone together on the 11th dimensional, and then on down to the 4-dimensional level.
Quantum Entanglement was Einstein’s Spooky Fear
Employing the implicate order as a framework can help us to begin to solve the mystery behind what Einstein once called the ‘spooky’ actions of elementary particles—in a very scientifically and therefore, non-spooky way. In October 2015, a team of Dutch physicists published an article in the journal Nature detailing their research into Quantum Entanglement.
Quantum entanglement occurs when one particle instantly influences another particle that it is not in direct physical contact with. In this experiment, the Dutch team facilitated quantum entanglement across a distance of one mile on the campus of Delft University in the Netherlands. They used two small diamond traps to capture one electron each, and then used super-fast laser pulses to cause both to entangle in the same electromagnetic field. When this entangled state occurred, the behavior of one electron instantly affected the behavior of the other in kind. This experiment also demonstrated that quantum superposition, the theory that states one particle can exist in two places at the same time, is scientific fact and not science fiction.
Of course, if a person’s conscious existence was limited solely to the four dimensions defined by time, physical autonomy and dead space, quantum entanglement would indeed seem either impossible at the most, or pretty darn spooky at the least. But if we can begin to see the Universe for the 11th dimensional, implicate order structure it actually is, then quantum entanglement becomes a fairly predictable 4-dimensional byproduct of the larger energy-frequency glue holding mass-matter together.
Quashing the Quantum Enigma
Another "mystery" the implicate order can solve is the Quantum Enigma. The quantum enigma dictates that light-based energy-frequency can act as either a particle or a wave. Its behavior is directly related to whether or not anything (or anyone) is focusing on it. So if a line of sight is directly present (so focused dead-to-rights), then light transforms into energy-frequency based particles; but if a line of sight is not directly present, the same light stays an energy-frequency wave instead. We welcome you to refresh your understanding of the energy-frequency based nature of particulate substances, human beings included, by re-visiting our blog article discussing the energy structure of physical reality.
What is more, and just like Ingo Swann being able to travel to Jupiter and back in the course of one Saturday afternoon, only about 5% of everything in existence, or what makes mass-matter, is bound to gravity anyway. The other 95% that is comprised of energy-frequency (including human beings) is not.
Particles defying the 'law' of gravity, is no longer able to be explained away be decoherence either, as recent discoveries of previously unknown planetary bodies in our own solar system demonstrate. This includes Astronomer Michele Bannister’s discovery of a small icy world beyond Neptune in 2016. This celestial body actually orbits the sun backwards, and does so at 110 degrees of the plane of the rest of the solar system. If gravity was the unflinching, Universal motion-based force Newton believed it was from underneath his apple tree, then all 4-dimensional objects large and small must adhere to it, and the movement of the small icy world Bannister found could not be possible. Yet it is indeed happening, which means gravity isn’t really the ultimate force—but simply a byproduct of a much larger, more intelligent, and all encompassing framework that is greater than the 4-dimensional entirely.
'Multiple Worlds' Vs an experimental Implicate Order Universe
The scientists who posit these kinds of multiple dimension theories are no different than religious leaders who promise their followers that an afterlife exists, but it just cannot be proven or experienced during this lifetime. In this context, if you replace the phrase "Multiple Universes" with "Heaven", you can easily understand what we mean. Both locations are mythical, and therefore unable to be disproved, which might be acceptable in religious terms, but is totally antithetical to the fundamental tenets of scientific inquiry. Because of this, scientists who posit the existence of other dimensions, or entire Universes that cannot be accessed, experienced and ultimately validated by human beings in everyday waking consciousness are not practicing science.
Rather, they are practicing the same speculative form of storytelling as those in positions of power who espouse the tenets of dogmatically interpretive religion. After all and in this regards, both schools of thought rely on the willing submission of one's empowerment, enlightenment and self-control based on un-provable and untestable hypotheses, i.e. promises that will never be fulfilled in this lifetime. But employing the testable implicate order and 11th dimensional bio-body suit allows us to formulate educated hypotheses, and then like Physicists Tiller and Bohm, test against them to see if they can be disproven. This is true science, and as we will now discuss, this brand of scientific inquiry already applies to testable reality and not just theoretical musing.
Let's Get Together
Many mainstream physicists who admit that the Universe behaves in a strange, entangled way on a quantum level or micro level, still have a difficult time understanding that the same laws apply for the relative, or macro level as well. What is more, just because those scientists choose not to cultivate an awareness of their own 11th dimensional spirit selves to experience and thus, be able to explain entanglement sans decoherence, does not make it any less real or scientifically valid. Between June 7th and July 30th, 1993, 4000 individuals from 62 countries gathered in Washington, D.C. for a thought intention experiment meant to reduce the incidences of violent crime in the D.C. area.
The Institute of Science, Technology and Public Policy monitored this gathering by commissioning a 27-member independent project review board consisting of sociologists and criminologists from leading universities, representatives from the police department, the local government, and various other civic leaders. All of the participants approved the project’s research protocol in advance, and jointly monitored its progress to ensure proper oversight.
The purpose of the experiment was to determine whether or not human variables, or people who undertake active work on altering non-localized consciousness in large groups, could alter external conditions around them with any verifiability. Prior to the experiment, a local journalist asked the police chief what it would take to have a significant reduction in the number of violent crimes during the summer of 1993. The chief laughed and replied something to the effect of needing 20 inches of snow to fall in order for that to occur.
In the case of the D.C. experiment, sending out harmonious, healthy and loving energy-frequency vibrations from their 11th dimensional spirit selves through the implicate order allowed other human beings, who were not even part of the controlled human variable group, to share in the same conscious reality as the control group without any localized, hands-on intervention at all.
Why Doesn't Mainstream Science Honor the Implicate Order?
“Elite” status is based on the amount of funding they receive, how many times they've published, how many patents they invented, or whether they were members of the National Academies of Sciences or the Institute of Medicine. Out of a pool of 12.935 subjects, researchers focused on 425 cases based on one major shared criterion: The sudden death of a non-retired elite scientist.
Upon such a death, intellectual competition increased across the board. The existence of intellectual power vacuums corresponding with early death indicates those scientists controlled official knowledge surrounding their research and/or disciplines. In doing so, they were able to influence the physical consciousness of other scientists and the public-at-large, whether or not doing so was in the best interest of anyone other than the rock star scientist.
It also demonstrates in “real world” and not just theoretical terms how invasive human bias can be when trying to accurately gather, authenticate and record the markers of physical consciousness that end up becoming part of society’s official knowledge base. Or, as the NBER researchers concluded, “The idiosyncratic stances (i.e. instrumentally subjective biases) of individual scientists can do much to alter, or at least delay, the course of scientific advance.”
Take a Stand Against Pseudo-Scientific Inquiry
What this means is that science, much like dogmatic interpretations of religion, is pretty narrow minded when it comes to allowing other points of view to come to light that run counter to existing biases. And as the NBER research indicates, this bias exists not solely in theory, but more damningly in fact and practice throughout Western science. Therefore, it is up to every sincere seeker of knowledge and wisdom to:
The Human Radio Intuitive Spiritual Coaching Program
If you would like to positively and responsibly elicit fundamental changes in your personal consciousness and thus, professional disciplines, please visit our Intuitive Spiritual Coaching Program page to learn more about how you can discover, understand and control your own Universe above and below, inside and out alike via your own individualized 11th dimensional spirit self-implicate order connection. And we welcome you to contact us with any questions you might have about intuitive coaching, or anything else we can help you with.
DONATE SECURELY VIA PAYPAL HERE
Please help keep The Human Radio Educational Research Project online. To learn more about how you donations help us and others in kind, please visit our Services page. To make a donation directly, please click on the PayPal icon below.